(C84) [Tengudou (Tengudake)] Shujuu no Kankei! - The Relation of Master to Servant (Bakemonogatari) [English] [AJS] [Decensored]

(C84) [テング堂 (テングダケ)] 主従の関係! (化物語) [英訳] [無修正]

Artists: tengudake (16)
Groups: tengudou (10)
Categories: doujinshi (138,264)
22 pages
Uploaded

or to post a comment.

noirONI
This fallen guy is a total hippacrit if look at his proflie his last 5 read r all harecore loli based also i think he talking about himself in a indirect manner cuz the detail screams (this is me)
noirONI
Bruh this comment section this fallen dude need a fuckin life and girlfriend and loli H-manga is fine it not what you read or watch it how you act, 2D good, real thing bad its that simple
Annie<3
i came here just to read some hentai.... and now i feel....i dont know how....i...oh, man!
xXshadowbladeXx
I could read this comment section for about 4 mins
tomlike
WTF IS THIS COMMENT SECTION DUDE
RuruLalilulelo
@ayy & Fallen I think isn't bad at all, I use to love a actual irl loli in truth is kinda conflicting since I only like 2D lolis. In my life I pass over 3 years with that loli Never touched her. But it seems kids now days can think like adults maybe is the phenomenon of the internet having access to anything, they end up in a place they shouldn't in society eyes and end up trying new stuff.
Biribiri
@fallenFromMeaning I happen to only like girls under the age of 12, if they're drawn. Otherwise, I'm just thinking "It's not the same." But I'm not legally able to be considered a pedophile due to certain unspecified info that is in relation to my time on earth. So yeah, good game. Though this "natural" phenomenon has occured in my brain, "corrupting" my reasoning for the good or worse, I am still quite attracted to girls not necessarily over the age of 13.
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 (continuing) even after a second study with the declared goal to proof the original study wrong while working statistically more rigorously failed to do so and instead confirmed the original findings. i cannot even start to understand the minds of people, who think they are doing the right thing by repressing proven facts, perhaps they are too blinded by examples of actual barbarous rape but that is just not what this is about. this is not about emotions, it is about facts. so as we see, trump is not really doing anything knew, nor is the scale unprecedented, it is just the targets that changed, and suddenly all who were glad to see such unmoral research banned are all about facts again. oh the humanity
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 (continuing) as the child can become overwhelmed by the unknown sensations and scared out of their mind or by later questionings and/or social indoctrination that they have done wrong and should be damaged, even if they cannot perceive such a thing, as surely they are just repressing the memory. one could go on and on and it still would be worthless as all of this sounds rather theoretical and without statistical proof, meaning proof on respectable sample sizes and in scientific conditions. that is where a study comes in that is kind of the modern galilei story. i guess one cannot post links here, so just search "rind et al. controversy" of course without the " on the english wikipedia. while the article is likely one of the most unbiased sources of information you can find, it still is biased , but even so you should be able to see pretty clearly how in this case research that did not fit the picture was just declared wrong, (continued next post)
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 (continuing) they are forced to do something against their will. and this is where shit gets controversial, because many argue that a child has no sexual interest and that therefore any sexual acts are the consequence of an adult using their superior knowledge and authority to convince the child to act against its own interests. the pure truth of this is to be doubted, though of course there certainly are cases where this applies, be it because the adult actually is an ass without regard to the wellbeing of the child or because the adult is wellmeaning but is not careful enough to recognize his own great influence over the child and the subtle signals that it would rather not be doing this. now as to arguments against this stance, we know from psychological research since quite some time that children can have sexual interest, it is known by now that children indeed can even climax. damage can be caused even if initial motivation is there, (continued next post)
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 (continuing) before you do anything drastic to anyone, think. before doing anything drastic to the normies that hate you, think of how they do not know better (even if they could and should) and that they think what they do is right and just. before doing anything drastic to yourself, think of how this would be the ultimate defeat, having been unable to do what you wanted and even doing the dirty work for those who drove you to this step, not having accomplished anything this is the final submission to society. before doing anything drastic to a loli, think of how damaging her in any way actually is directly opposed to your motivation of love to said loli. what actually is damaging is a subject where long fruitless debates are to be had, what we definitely know is that physical damage will occur if any kind of penetration is attempted at the lower ranges of age covered by the term loli and that psychological damage is likely in anyone of any age if (continued next post)
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 continuing. since most of these drawings come from japan, where those attracted to young girls are called "roricon", which for western ears sounds like lolicon, the genre of manga involving sexualized depictions of girls roughly between 6 and 12 is called lolicon. roricon is derived from lolita complex, which in turn was coined by a novel titled lolita, if you have further interest in the origins of the term, you could read it up on wikipedia. so a loli is a girl that is out of infancy but has not hit puberty yet, sometimes people use the term to refer to sexualized depictions only or drawings only. since you are a pedophile, or lolicon or whatever you might call it, you will have a hard life. you will most likely sooner or later fall in love with someone you should not by law and social standards. this will be agonizing and there will be noone you could turn to for help, noone to trust. no matter how much you feel that it does not matter anymore, (continued in next post)
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 in my last post i thought i could be a little humorous, but it seems you are either very young or inexperienced, so i will try to be more direct. you like this kind of stuff, so it is pretty certain you are a pedophile. this makes you hated or feared or both in large parts of the population of any country. do not talk to anyone who could identify you about this aspect of yourself and hide it as best as you can, even from your parents and best friends. when you are more experienced you might try to test carefully if a person might have a little bit of tolerance and understanding left for your kind, but you will have to be capable of identifying their mindset before making them suspicious. regarding your question, since pornography involving children is illegal around the world, while drawn pictures are mostly legal, though you should check the legal status of those drawings in your jurisdiction, these drawings are a common replacement. continued in next post
WhiteHorse69
what it´s exactly a loli?
fallenFromMeaning
@WhiteHorse69 most definitely, rejoice for being among the chosen ones, otherwise depression is likely to kill you. though you might want to adapt the use of obscuring language to conceal that fact, maybe even from yourself. therefore try to refer to stuff like this as lolicon and young girls as lolis, sounds less suspicious. :D
arefin0991
How to Lolify a forever Loli.
GreyAlien
Guess Joey was right... Shinobu realy is best girl.